What is wrong with these arguments made by a christian online encyclopedia?
* Atheists use circular logic to "disprove" the existence of God. That is, they presuppose that God does not exist and then argue that all proofs for the existence of God must be flawed because He does not exist. Christians can use presuppositional apologetics to break the circle of the atheists' circular reasoning.
* Atheists use circular logic to "disprove" the existence of God. That is, they presuppose that God does not exist and then argue that all proofs for the existence of God must be flawed because He does not exist. Christians can use presuppositional apologetics to break the circle of the atheists' circular reasoning.
* Muslims also use circular logic to defend the Qur'an. They argue that the Qur'an is true because it is the Word of Allah, that it is the Word of Allah because it says so, and that we can rely on it because it is true. This is completely different from why the Bible is true.
* Evolutionists will claim that a fossil is millions of years old because that is the date given by radiometric dating; then state that it is reliable because they "know" that the fossil is millions of years old due to the strata in which it was found; additionally because the radiometric dating methods agree with each other, and date correctly materials which were historically dated by humans.
-source: Fstdt
- Begging the Question: They start off with the assumptions that atheists, muslims, and evolutionists all start off with the assumption that God isn't real, or Allah is real when they make argukuments. This is false.
- Ad hominem (abusive
Anything else?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteat first griffin i thought the argument they where making was . i was shocked to say the least. as far as the excerpt goes you are right with the begging the question that the christian online encyclopedia made. i don't have enough information on Muslim religion. though i do know enough about evolutionists to argue their claim they make against evolutionists. it is a very small part of why evolution is believed to be true. so it isn't as circular as they make it out to be. which atheists use evidence from evolutionists to support their claims. so evolutionist and atheists sort of go hand in hand with their ideas. where as the COE made it sound like they are two completely different ideas.
ReplyDelete